J. Aum Ceram. Sac, 85 [7 1815-22(2002) ournal Developing Interfacial Carbon-Boron-Silicon Coatings for Silicon Nitride- Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Improved Oxidation Resistance Kiyoshi Sato, f Hiroki Morozumi, Osamu Funayama, Hiroshi Kaya, and Takeshi Isoda Tonen General Sekiya, Iruma-gun, Saitama 356-8500, Japan C-B-Si coatings were formed on a Sin fiber using chemical deposition(CVD). That work has demonst vapor deposition and embedded in a Si-N-C matrix using oxidation resistance on single-filament layer was anticipated to form borosilicate glass containing only-a microcomposite oxygen-diffusion s. Two types of C-B-Si coatings were A Bn and oxide layer has been investigated elsewhere as a tested on the fiber-matrix interface, and they improved the ubstitute for the carbon layer. h-Bn has a layered crystal multilayered:a crystalline sublayer composed of B-Si-C was between its crystal layers. A BN layer is useful for controlling SiC-fiber-reinforced Sic and SiC-fiber-reinforced glass. 2The second coating was a graphitelike carbon layer containing a oxidation starting temperature of BN is only 100 K higher than small amount of boron and silicon. The carbon(sub)layer of both coatings weakened the fiber-matrix bonding, giving the carbon, but BN is expected to form B, O,, which seals th composites a high flexural strength(l1 GPa). The composites ygen-diffusion passes. A composite with a Bn layer shows retained 60%0-70% of their initial strength, even after oxida oxidation resistance to >1100 K, but it experiences embrittlement tion at 1523 K for 100 h. The mechanism for improved oxidation at intermediate temperatures, 900-1 100 K, because of the active resistance was discussed through the microstructure of the xidation of E nterface, morphology of the fracture surface, and oxygen An interfacial oxide coating offers the considerable advantage distribution on a cross section of the oxidized composite. of causing no oxidation degradation. However, an oxide interface is not adequate for a non-oxide fiber, because the oxide layer diffuses oxygen to the fiber. Recently, all-oxide composites . Introduction have been actively studied because of their stability under an oxidizing atmosphere. -However, among the disadvantages of F ER-REINFORCED ceramic composites show promise for over. all-oxide composites is high-temperature creep above -1500 K, which results from an intrinsic property of ordinal oxides. Thus, the bonding between fiber and matrix is important to giving a the problem of improving the oxidation resistance of ceramic composite strength and toughness, because weak bonding prevents a matrix crack from propagating to a fiber. A carbon layer has composites has remained unsolved. The present study focused on a non-oxide composite, because the carbon layer oxidizes above -700 K in air, limiting the the high strength of such a composite at high temperature improves oxidation resistance of the composite , Two approaches have oxidation resistance. A C-B-Si coating was produced using CVD been investigated as a solution to this problem:()preventin ea at oxidation of the carbon layer; and(ii)replacing the carbon lay the C-B-Si layer would form a borosilicate glass, sealing the with an oxidation-resistant layer oxygen-diffusion passes, as had the BN,and boron-containing Various studies have investigated preventing oxidation of the carbon layers, and(ii) controlling the B: Si ratio in the C-B-Si carbon layer. The addition of boron in a matrix or an interface layer would change the softening temperature and viscosity of the layer, to form a B2O3 or borosilicate-glass seal at low tempera- borosilicate glass, improving the performance of the seal. The tures, has been studied. The oxygen-diffusion passes that must be ternary system C-B-Si was selected to form a carbon-rich phase, ealed are the matrix cracks and interfacial gaps resulting from the which would cause fiber-matrix debonding. A Si-B-N layer could oxidation loss of the carbon layer. The addition of a boride powde function as C-B-Si if a h-BN sublayer was formed, but a nitride to the matrix partially prevents oxidatio coating was more difficult than a carbon coating to fabricate usi Jacques et al. lo have produced an interface layer of 20 mol% CVD. a polymer-impregnation and pyrolysis(PIP)method- boron-containing carbon on a SiC fiber using chemical vapor vas u sed in the present study to fabricate the composite. The advantage of the PIP method was that it could make use of shaping techniques from the industrial process for fiber-reinforced plastics T.A. Parthasarathry-contributing editor However, improving the oxidation resistance of PlP composites was difficult because of open pores and matrix cracks, formed by pyrolysis shrinkage of the polymer, that diffused oxygen into th composite. The present method of providing oxidation resistance Manuscript No. 188719. Received February 25, 2000; approved September 10, to PIP composites should be effective on other porous composite orted by the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, and work conducted such as reaction-bonded composites and pore-free composites such as chemical vapor infiltrated composites dence should be addressed. Now with Advanced This paper first describes the properties of a C-B-Si coating on Materials International Co, Fuji, Shizuoka 416-0946, Japan. Kanagawa 234-0192, Japan. echnical Center, Nissan Motor Co, Ltd, Atsugi, Si3N4 fiber. Results for the investigation of composites with C-B-Si interfacial layer are described in terms of the fiber-matrix Formerly Tonen Corporation interface microstructure, mechanical properties, and oxidation 1815
Developing Interfacial Carbon-Boron-Silicon Coatings for Silicon Nitride-Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Improved Oxidation Resistance Kiyoshi Sato,* ,† Hiroki Morozumi,‡ Osamu Funayama,* Hiroshi Kaya, and Takeshi Isoda Tonen General Sekiya,§ Iruma-gun, Saitama 356-8500, Japan C-B-Si coatings were formed on a Si3N4 fiber using chemical vapor deposition and embedded in a Si-N-C matrix using polymer impregnation and pyrolysis. The boron-containing layer was anticipated to form borosilicate glass and seal oxygen-diffusion passes. Two types of C-B-Si coatings were tested on the fiber–matrix interface, and they improved the oxidation resistance of the composite. The first coating was multilayered: a crystalline sublayer composed of B-Si-C was sandwiched between two graphitelike carbon sublayers. The second coating was a graphitelike carbon layer containing a small amount of boron and silicon. The carbon (sub)layer of both coatings weakened the fiber–matrix bonding, giving the composites a high flexural strength (1.1 GPa). The composites retained 60%–70% of their initial strength, even after oxidation at 1523 K for 100 h. The mechanism for improved oxidation resistance was discussed through the microstructure of the interface, morphology of the fracture surface, and oxygen distribution on a cross section of the oxidized composite. I. Introduction FIBER-REINFORCED ceramic composites show promise for overcoming the brittleness of monolithic ceramics.1–3 Control of the bonding between fiber and matrix is important to giving a composite strength and toughness, because weak bonding prevents a matrix crack from propagating to a fiber.4,5 A carbon layer has been applied at the fiber–matrix interface for this purpose,1–5 but the carbon layer oxidizes above 700 K in air, limiting the oxidation resistance of the composite.6,7 Two approaches have been investigated as a solution to this problem: (i) preventing oxidation of the carbon layer; and (ii) replacing the carbon layer with an oxidation-resistant layer. Various studies have investigated preventing oxidation of the carbon layer. The addition of boron in a matrix or an interface layer, to form a B2O3 or borosilicate-glass seal at low temperatures, has been studied. The oxygen-diffusion passes that must be sealed are the matrix cracks and interfacial gaps resulting from the oxidation loss of the carbon layer. The addition of a boride powder to the matrix partially prevents oxidation of the carbon interface.8,9 Jacques et al.10 have produced an interface layer of 20 mol% boron-containing carbon on a SiC fiber using chemical vapor deposition (CVD). That work has demonstrated the advantage of oxidation resistance on single-filament-reinforced composites only—a microcomposite. A BN and oxide layer has been investigated elsewhere as a substitute for the carbon layer. h-BN has a layered crystal structure, similar to graphite, which causes slip and debonding between its crystal layers. A BN layer is useful for controlling adhesion between the fiber and matrix in many composites, such as SiC-fiber-reinforced SiC11 and SiC-fiber-reinforced glass.12 The oxidation starting temperature of BN is only 100 K higher than carbon, but BN is expected to form B2O3, which seals the oxygen-diffusion passes. A composite with a BN layer shows oxidation resistance to 1100 K, but it experiences embrittlement at intermediate temperatures, 900–1100 K, because of the active oxidation of BN.13,14 An interfacial oxide coating offers the considerable advantage of causing no oxidation degradation.15–17 However, an oxide interface is not adequate for a non-oxide fiber, because the oxide layer diffuses oxygen to the fiber.18 Recently, all-oxide composites have been actively studied because of their stability under an oxidizing atmosphere.19–22 However, among the disadvantages of all-oxide composites is high-temperature creep above 1500 K, which results from an intrinsic property of ordinal oxides. Thus, the problem of improving the oxidation resistance of ceramic composites has remained unsolved. The present study focused on a non-oxide composite, because the high strength of such a composite at high temperature improves oxidation resistance. A C-B-Si coating was produced using CVD and applied at the fiber–matrix interface. We anticipated that (i) the C-B-Si layer would form a borosilicate glass, sealing the oxygen-diffusion passes, as had the BN11,12 and boron-containing carbon10 layers, and (ii) controlling the B:Si ratio in the C-B-Si layer would change the softening temperature and viscosity of the borosilicate glass, improving the performance of the seal. The ternary system C-B-Si was selected to form a carbon-rich phase, which would cause fiber–matrix debonding. A Si-B-N layer could function as C-B-Si if a h-BN sublayer was formed, but a nitride coating was more difficult than a carbon coating to fabricate using CVD. A polymer-impregnation and pyrolysis (PIP) method23–26 was used in the present study to fabricate the composite. The advantage of the PIP method was that it could make use of shaping techniques from the industrial process for fiber-reinforced plastics. However, improving the oxidation resistance of PIP composites was difficult because of open pores and matrix cracks, formed by pyrolysis shrinkage of the polymer, that diffused oxygen into the composite. The present method of providing oxidation resistance to PIP composites should be effective on other porous composites, such as reaction-bonded composites and pore-free composites, such as chemical vapor infiltrated composites. This paper first describes the properties of a C-B-Si coating on a Si3N4 fiber. Results for the investigation of composites with a C-B-Si interfacial layer are described in terms of the fiber–matrix interface microstructure, mechanical properties, and oxidation T. A. Parthasarathy—contributing editor Manuscript No. 188719. Received February 25, 2000; approved September 10, 2001. Supported by the Ministry of Economy, Trade, and Industry, and work conducted by the Petroleum Energy Center. *Member, American Ceramic Society. † Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. Now with Advanced Materials International Co., Fuji, Shizuoka 416-0946, Japan. ‡ Present address: Nissan Technical Center, Nissan Motor Co., Ltd., Atsugi, Kanagawa 234-0192, Japan. § Formerly Tonen Corporation. J. Am. Ceram. Soc., 85 [7] 1815–22 (2002) 1815 journal
l816 Journal of the American Ceramic Society-Sato et al. Vol. 85. No. 7 Bobbin Exhaust Precursor gas Exhaust Oiling roller chamber Deposition chamber Winder N2 Bobbin Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of the apparatus for fiber coating resistance of the composites Properties of the SiC-fiber-reinforced reinforcement and methylhydrosilazane(MHS; NN710, Tonen composite produced when a C-B-Si layer is applied to a Sic fiber Corp, Tokyo, Japan)as a matrix precursor. Details of the are evaluated fabrication process and properties of MHS are described else where 30, MHS was a random copolymer mposed of -SiH,NHI and-SiMeHNHH units and converted to an amor- IL. Experimental Procedure phous Si-N-C by pyrolysis at 1200 K in a nitrogen-gas or inert (I Preparation and Analysis of coatings atmosphere. The chemical composition of the pyrolyzed MHS was Two fibers were used as reinforcements in the present study: () (in mol%)43 silicon, 38 nitrogen, 18 carbon, and 1 oxygen, with an amorphous Si,Na fib developed by Tonen Corporation a 1: 1 ratio of -SiH,NH-ISiMeHNHh and pyrolysis was and(ii) a commercial SiC fiber(Hinicalon, Nippon Carbon C performed in nitrogen gas at 1623 K 30, Unidirectionally rein- Tokyo, Japan). The Si3 N4 fiber was a strand composed of 1000 forced composites were fabricated by the following process: () fabrication of unidirectionally fiber-aligned prepreg; (ii) stacking single filaments. The diameter of the filament was 10 um. The and curing of the prepreg sheets: (i) pyrolysis of a cured sample chemical composition of the fiber was(in mass%)60 silicon, 37 at 1623 K: and (iv) densification of the sample by seven cycles of nitrogen, <1 carbon, and <3 oxygen, The fabrication method and basic character of the fiber are described elsewhere 27,28 impregnation and pyrolysis. Details of the process are described The C-B-Si coating was formed using the CVD apparatus elsewhere 30-32 described in Fig. 1, which consisted of a strand feeder, cleaning The mechanical properties of the composites were evaluated chamber, deposition chamber, and strand winder. The cleaning a terms of flexural strength and interlaminar shear strength (ILSS)at deposition chambers were tubular fumaces with an inner diameter room temperature. The test pieces, which were cut from the of 60 mm and lengths of I and 3 m, respectively. A strand of fiber composite panels, measured 4 mm X 40 mm X 3 mm for the was fed from a bobbin to the cleaning chamber at 33 mm/s and flexural test and 4 mm x 12 mm x 2 mm for the ilss test. the heated to 1073 K under a nitrogen-gas atmosphere, where the longitudinal direction of the test pieces was aligned with the fiber sizing on the fiber thermally decomposed. The desized strand was orientation. The flexural strength was measured using the three. oated with C-B-Si by the reaction of BCl3, SiCla, CHa, and H under atmospheric pressure, in the deposition chamber. Nitroge The span and testing speed of the ILSs test were 8 mm and 8.3 was used as the carrier gas. Finally, the coated strand was resized um/s, respectively. Both tests were completed five times. The with a polyether and wound onto another bobbin in the winder volume content of fiber (e was calculated from the dimensions of The single-filament strengths of the uncoated fiber and the the composite panel and the amount of fiber used. The bulk density oated fiber were tested. according to ASTM standard. 1 at room was calculated from the weight and dimensions of the test piece temperature(25 mm gauge length, 8.3 um/s testing speed, 25 used for the flexural-strength test. The true density of the compos- tests). Cross-section areas of the filaments, needed for strength ite was measured using a pycnometer at 303 K, using n-butanol a calculations. were measured from observations of the fracture the medium, on a sample crushed under No 80 mesh. surface using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Auger elec- For the oxidation test on the composites, the test pieces measuring tron spectroscopy (AES, Model No. PHI650, ULVAC, Ltd 4 mm X 40 mm x 3 mm were placed inside a tube fumace, heated okyo, Japan), with accelerating voltage of 3 kv and sample to a given temperature at a rate of 0.167 K/s, and maintained at that current of 3 nA, was used to examine the elemental depth profiles temperature for a given time under a dry-air flow of 74 mmol/s. Some of the coatings. The etching rate, determined using argon sputter samples were exposed at the same temperature and time, under a ing, was 0.27 nm/s, with SiO, as a standard nitrogen-gas flow of 74 as references The deposits in the deposition chamber were analyzed to The microstructure of the fiber-matrix interface was investi investigate the synthesis mechanism of the multilayered coating ated using transmission electron microscopy(TEM; Model No. Graphite sheets were placed inside the chamber, along its tubular JEM3010, JEOL) using the following techniques: (i)observation wall, before the coating operation. The graphite sheets were on a bright-field image; (ii)crystal-structure analysis by nanobeam emoved from the furnace after the operation was complete and electron diffraction (NBED)with a 5 nm beam, and (iii)elemental analyzed using electron probe microanalysis(EPMA; Model No analysis by energy dispersive spectroscopy(EDS), with a 5 nm JXA8600MX, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and X-ray diffractometry beam. aes depth profiles were investigated on the surfaces of a (XRD; Model No. RINT 1400, Rigaku Co, Ltd, Tokyo, Japan) ullout fiber and on the matrices from which a fiber had debonded after fracture. The measuring conditions for aes were the same as those for the coated fiber (2) Preparation and Analysis of the Composite Composite panels measuring 100 mm X 100 mm x 3 mm were fabricated using the PIP process, with the coated fiber as a IlL. Results Modulus Single-Filam Materials, ASTM Designation D-3379- Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, P. deposition conditions of the coatings are shown in Table I. A
resistance of the composites. Properties of the SiC-fiber-reinforced composite produced when a C-B-Si layer is applied to a SiC fiber are evaluated. II. Experimental Procedure (1) Preparation and Analysis of Coatings Two fibers were used as reinforcements in the present study: (i) an amorphous Si3N4 fiber27,28 developed by Tonen Corporation; and (ii) a commercial SiC fiber29 (Hinicalon, Nippon Carbon Co., Tokyo, Japan). The Si3N4 fiber was a strand composed of 1000 single filaments. The diameter of the filament was 10 m. The chemical composition of the fiber was (in mass%) 60 silicon, 37 nitrogen, 1 carbon, and 3 oxygen. The fabrication method and basic character of the fiber are described elsewhere.27,28 The C-B-Si coating was formed using the CVD apparatus described in Fig. 1, which consisted of a strand feeder, cleaning chamber, deposition chamber, and strand winder. The cleaning and deposition chambers were tubular furnaces with an inner diameter of 60 mm and lengths of 1 and 3 m, respectively. A strand of fiber was fed from a bobbin to the cleaning chamber at 33 mm/s and heated to 1073 K under a nitrogen-gas atmosphere, where the sizing on the fiber thermally decomposed. The desized strand was coated with C-B-Si by the reaction of BCl3, SiCl4, CH4, and H2, under atmospheric pressure, in the deposition chamber. Nitrogen was used as the carrier gas. Finally, the coated strand was resized with a polyether and wound onto another bobbin in the winder. The single-filament strengths of the uncoated fiber and the coated fiber were tested, according to ASTM standard,¶ at room temperature (25 mm gauge length, 8.3 m/s testing speed, 25 tests). Cross-section areas of the filaments, needed for strength calculations, were measured from observations of the fracture surface using scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Auger electron spectroscopy (AES; Model No. PHI650, ULVAC, Ltd., Tokyo, Japan), with accelerating voltage of 3 kV and sample current of 3 nA, was used to examine the elemental depth profiles of the coatings. The etching rate, determined using argon sputtering, was 0.27 nm/s, with SiO2 as a standard. The deposits in the deposition chamber were analyzed to investigate the synthesis mechanism of the multilayered coating. Graphite sheets were placed inside the chamber, along its tubular wall, before the coating operation. The graphite sheets were removed from the furnace after the operation was complete and analyzed using electron probe microanalysis (EPMA; Model No. JXA8600MX, JEOL, Tokyo, Japan) and X-ray diffractometry (XRD; Model No. RINT 1400, Rigaku Co., Ltd., Tokyo, Japan). (2) Preparation and Analysis of the Composite Composite panels measuring 100 mm 100 mm 3 mm were fabricated using the PIP process, with the coated fiber as a reinforcement and methylhydrosilazane (MHS; NN710, Tonen Corp., Tokyo, Japan) as a matrix precursor. Details of the fabrication process and properties of MHS are described elsewhere.30,31 MHS was a random copolymer, composed of –[SiH2NH]– and –[SiMeHNH]– units and converted to an amorphous Si-N-C by pyrolysis at 1200 K in a nitrogen-gas or inert atmosphere. The chemical composition of the pyrolyzed MHS was (in mol%) 43 silicon, 38 nitrogen, 18 carbon, and 1 oxygen, with a 1:1 ratio of –[SiH2NH]–:–[SiMeHNH]–, and pyrolysis was performed in nitrogen gas at 1623 K.30,31 Unidirectionally reinforced composites were fabricated by the following process: (i) fabrication of unidirectionally fiber-aligned prepreg; (ii) stacking and curing of the prepreg sheets; (iii) pyrolysis of a cured sample at 1623 K; and (iv) densification of the sample by seven cycles of impregnation and pyrolysis. Details of the process are described elsewhere.30–32 The mechanical properties of the composites were evaluated in terms of flexural strength and interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) at room temperature. The test pieces, which were cut from the composite panels, measured 4 mm 40 mm 3 mm for the flexural test and 4 mm 12 mm 2 mm for the ILSS test. The longitudinal direction of the test pieces was aligned with the fiber orientation. The flexural strength was measured using the threepoint bend test, with a 30 mm span and a 8.3 m/s testing speed. The span and testing speed of the ILSS test were 8 mm and 8.3 m/s, respectively. Both tests were completed five times. The volume content of fiber (Vf ) was calculated from the dimensions of the composite panel and the amount of fiber used. The bulk density was calculated from the weight and dimensions of the test piece used for the flexural-strength test. The true density of the composite was measured using a pycnometer at 303 K, using n-butanol as the medium, on a sample crushed under No. 80 mesh. For the oxidation test on the composites, the test pieces measuring 4 mm 40 mm 3 mm were placed inside a tube furnace, heated to a given temperature at a rate of 0.167 K/s, and maintained at that temperature for a given time under a dry-air flow of 74 mmol/s. Some samples were exposed at the same temperature and time, under a nitrogen-gas flow of 74 mmol/s, as references. The microstructure of the fiber–matrix interface was investigated using transmission electron microscopy (TEM; Model No. JEM3010, JEOL) using the following techniques: (i) observation on a bright-field image; (ii) crystal-structure analysis by nanobeam electron diffraction (NBED) with a 5 nm beam; and (iii) elemental analysis by energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS), with a 5 nm beam. AES depth profiles were investigated on the surfaces of a pullout fiber and on the matrices from which a fiber had debonded after fracture. The measuring conditions for AES were the same as those for the coated fiber. III. Results (1) Coatings Two types of fiber coating, coating I and II, were effective in the improvement of the oxidation resistance of composites. The deposition conditions of the coatings are shown in Table I. A ¶ “Standard Test Method for Tensile Strength and Young’s Modulus for HighModulus Single-Filament Materials,” ASTM Designation D-3379–75. American Society for Testing and Materials, West Conshohocken, PA. Fig. 1. Schematic drawing of the apparatus for fiber coating. 1816 Journal of the American Ceramic Society—Sato et al. Vol. 85, No. 7
July 2002 C-B-Si Coatings for S, Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Improved Oxidation Resistance l817 Table. Fabrication Conditions and Thicknesses of C-B-Si Coatings ating condition Thickness of Gas-flow rate(mmols-) Coating BCl3 SiCl CH4 H, N I0.298 0741.124461448 40-120 I0.149 0740.005.581448 R0.000 3720.004.171448100-200 (a) Sputter time()0.81.0 ference condition, R, included a carbon coating, the properties of which were described in a previous paper. Figure 2 shows depth profiles of coatings I and Il Coating thickness, determined by aES analysis, is shown in Table I Coating I had a boron-containing sublayer Coating Il contained a small amount of boron. However, the aes depth profile had the following problems, so that only relative changes in elemental composition were valid: (i)disagree 百E8 -- ment of the composition of the Si3 N4 fiber with the chemical analytical value;27,28 and(ii)miscalculation of 15 mol% of boron on the Si3N4 fiber, nevertheless nondetection of a boron peak in the AES spectra. These disagreements were explained by inaccu- facies of the default-calculation parameters and misreading of the (b)0002。0406 081.0 spectrum background by the calculation program. Therefore, the Sputter time(ks) depth profile on Fig. 2 was revised using the AES spectra as follows. Fig. 2. Depth profile of apparent elemental composition on(a)coating (1) For coating I, the surface consisted of carbon only, and boron, silicon, and nitrogen were detected at depths of 15, 30, and 60 nm, respectively. Boron had the maximum value, at a depth of 60 nm. The concentrations of silicon and nitrogen increased gradually and reached saturation at a depth of 120 nm, which the fiber side to the matrix side. The L2 presented the image of a nded to a ber interfa crystal lattice with 0.26 nm interlayer spacing. The NBED pattern (2) For coating Il, the surface consisted of carbon, and of the L2 layer was obscure spots, suggesting that L2 was silicon, and nitrogen were detected at depths of 15, 30, and 30 nm composed of disordered crystallites. The NBED patterns of bright respectively. Boron did not mark the obvious maximum value. layers LI and l3 lacked a lattice image and showed obscure rings, Silicon and nitrogen increased gradually, reaching saturation at a which polarized the brightness toward the direction of the fiber depth of 80 nm surface. Therefore, LI and L3 were composed of crystallites with The deposits in the CVd chamber after the preparation of very low crystallinity, oriented toward the fiber surface. EDS was coating I were examined using EPMA and XRD. The deposit sed on the fiber-matrix interface to obtain elemental information were >10 um thick, i.e., thick enough to make the peaks of the oron,although definitely contained in the sample, was not substrate graphite negligible on EPMA. Figure 3 shows changes in detected because of limitations in the present equipment. The peak ak intensity for each element along the longitudinal direction of intensities of carbon and silicon on the interface were about three the chamber. The temperature distribution in the chamber was mes and one-forth, respectively, that on the Si-N-C matrix; measured, using a thermocouple inserted into the chamber, under therefore, the interface consisted mainly of carbon and a small the flow of a carrier gas only. No deposit was observed below.8 amount of silicon. m(0. 8 m upstream from the center of the furnace). At-08 m boron and carbon were first detected. The boron attained a maximum value at-0.75 m. The carbon intensity exhibited a minimum at the boron maximum and then increased gradually on the uited a maximum at-03 m. Peaks of B,C were detected from 1500 ≌ peaks of 3C-SiC were detected from.5 to-0.1 m. The existence of carbon in the deposit was not confirmed using XRD. Because 0.8 the intrusion depth of the X-rays was greater than the thickness of 2 POB the deposits, the diffraction peaks of the substrate graphite over 06 lapped that of the deposit. The single-filament strength of the coated fibers is shown in 90.4 Table Il. The strength of the as-fabricated fiber was scattered among the fabrication lots of the fiber. Thus, a direct comparison of the strengths of the coated fibers was inadequate; the strength retention ratio was used. The retention ratio of each fiber was 77%121% 0.0 (2) Interface between Fiber and Matrin Position from center of furnace(m) The composite reinforced with Si3N4 fiber coated with coatin I is described here as composite I. Figure 4(a)shows the TEM Fig. 3. Change of relative intensity of boron, carbon, and silicon peaks image of the fiber-matrix interface of non-oxidized composite I EMPA analysis on the deposits in the coating chamber after fabrication coating I. Relative intensity he ratio of the peak intensity of ar The interface of this composite had a layered structure, composed lement on the deposit to that on the simple body of the element under the of a bright layer 5 nm thick (LI), a dark layer 10-15 m thick same measuring conditions. Origin of the horizontal axis is positioned on (2), and a bright layer 10-15 nm thick(3), in that order, from the center of the coating chamber. Negative direction is the upstream side
reference condition, R, included a carbon coating, the properties of which were described in a previous paper.33 Figure 2 shows depth profiles of coatings I and II. Coating thickness, determined by AES analysis, is shown in Table I. Coating I had a boron-containing sublayer. Coating II contained a small amount of boron. However, the AES depth profile had the following problems, so that only relative changes in elemental composition were valid: (i) disagreement of the composition of the Si3N4 fiber with the chemical analytical value;27,28 and (ii) miscalculation of 15 mol% of boron on the Si3N4 fiber, nevertheless nondetection of a boron peak in the AES spectra. These disagreements were explained by inaccuracies of the default-calculation parameters and misreading of the spectrum background by the calculation program. Therefore, the depth profile on Fig. 2 was revised using the AES spectra as follows. (1) For coating I, the surface consisted of carbon only, and boron, silicon, and nitrogen were detected at depths of 15, 30, and 60 nm, respectively. Boron had the maximum value, at a depth of 60 nm. The concentrations of silicon and nitrogen increased gradually and reached saturation at a depth of 120 nm, which corresponded to a coating–fiber interface. (2) For coating II, the surface consisted of carbon, and boron, silicon, and nitrogen were detected at depths of 15, 30, and 30 nm, respectively. Boron did not mark the obvious maximum value. Silicon and nitrogen increased gradually, reaching saturation at a depth of 80 nm. The deposits in the CVD chamber after the preparation of coating I were examined using EPMA and XRD. The deposits were 10 m thick, i.e., thick enough to make the peaks of the substrate graphite negligible on EPMA. Figure 3 shows changes in peak intensity for each element along the longitudinal direction of the chamber. The temperature distribution in the chamber was measured, using a thermocouple inserted into the chamber, under the flow of a carrier gas only. No deposit was observed below –0.8 m (0.8 m upstream from the center of the furnace). At –0.8 m, boron and carbon were first detected. The boron attained a maximum value at –0.75 m. The carbon intensity exhibited a minimum at the boron maximum and then increased gradually on the downstream side. Silicon was detected from –0.7 m and exhibited a maximum at –0.3 m. Peaks of B4C were detected from –0.7 to –0.6 m from XRD analysis of the deposits. Very weak peaks of 3C-SiC were detected from –0.5 to –0.1 m. The existence of carbon in the deposit was not confirmed using XRD. Because the intrusion depth of the X-rays was greater than the thickness of the deposits, the diffraction peaks of the substrate graphite overlapped that of the deposit. The single-filament strength of the coated fibers is shown in Table II. The strength of the as-fabricated fiber was scattered among the fabrication lots of the fiber. Thus, a direct comparison of the strengths of the coated fibers was inadequate; the strength retention ratio was used. The retention ratio of each fiber was 77%–121%. (2) Interface between Fiber and Matrix The composite reinforced with Si3N4 fiber coated with coating I is described here as composite I. Figure 4(a) shows the TEM image of the fiber–matrix interface of non-oxidized composite I. The interface of this composite had a layered structure, composed of a bright layer 5 nm thick (L1), a dark layer 10–15 nm thick (L2), and a bright layer 10–15 nm thick (L3), in that order, from the fiber side to the matrix side. The L2 presented the image of a crystal lattice with 0.26 nm interlayer spacing. The NBED pattern of the L2 layer was obscure spots, suggesting that L2 was composed of disordered crystallites. The NBED patterns of bright layers L1 and L3 lacked a lattice image and showed obscure rings, which polarized the brightness toward the direction of the fiber surface. Therefore, L1 and L3 were composed of crystallites with very low crystallinity, oriented toward the fiber surface. EDS was used on the fiber–matrix interface to obtain elemental information. Boron, although definitely contained in the sample, was not detected because of limitations in the present equipment. The peak intensities of carbon and silicon on the interface were about three times and one-forth, respectively, that on the Si-N-C matrix; therefore, the interface consisted mainly of carbon and a small amount of silicon. Table I. Fabrication Conditions and Thicknesses of C-B-Si Coatings Coating Coating condition Thickness of coating on Si3N4 fiber (nm) Gas-flow rate (mmols 1 ) Temperature BCl (K) 3 SiCl4 CH4 H2 N2 I 0.298 0.149 0.074 1.12 4.46 1448 40–120 II 0.149 0.223 0.074 0.00 5.58 1448 30–80 R 0.000 0.372 0.372 0.00 4.17 1448 100–200 Fig. 2. Depth profile of apparent elemental composition on (a) coating I and (b) coating II using AES. Fig. 3. Change of relative intensity of boron, carbon, and silicon peaks by EMPA analysis on the deposits in the coating chamber after fabrication of coating I. Relative intensity was the ratio of the peak intensity of an element on the deposit to that on the simple body of the element under the same measuring conditions. Origin of the horizontal axis is positioned on the center of the coating chamber. Negative direction is the upstream side. July 2002 C-B-Si Coatings for S3N4-Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Improved Oxidation Resistance 1817
l818 Journal of the American Ceramic Society-Sato et al. Vol. 85. No. 7 Table ll. Strength and Elastic Modulus of Row Fibers and Coated Fibers As-fabricated fiber Coated fiber Strength(GPa) E(GPa) Strength(GPa) E(GPa) Fiber 1.71 0.38 0.56 157 2.66 0.38 91 37 2.56 0.65 216 96 TsD is standard deviation Figure 4(b)shows a TEM image of the fiber-matrix interface of carbon Silicon and nitrogen were detected at a depth from 15 nm, non-oxidized composite Il. The interface was a monolayer 20 nm increased slowly, and reached saturation at a depth of 50 nm, where thick, with no crystal lattice, and it exhibited an obscure ring the Si-N-C matrix was located. Seven of eight samples showed result pattern under NBED. Under EDS, the peak intensities of carbon similar to those in Fig. 5(b), the one exception had a boron-containin and silicon on the interface were, respectively, about three times surface layer. In the case of composite Il, the pullout fiber had a and one-third that on the si-N-C matrix; therefore, the interface surface layer 80-110 nm thick, which consisted of carbon and a small consisted of carbon and a small amount of silicon amount of boron. The surface layer of the fractured matrix consisted Figure 4(c) shows the fiber-matrix interface of composite I mainly of carbon and was <15 nm thick. No boron-containing layer oxidized at 1523 K for 10 h The observed point located just under was found on the matrix surface the oxygen-sealing layer is discussed later. The fiber, Ll, and L2 exhibited no change with oxidation. L3 and the matrix showed bvious changes: (i) bright bubbles(B in Fig 4(c), where L3 was (3) Oxidation Resistance of Composites located before oxidation; and (ii) a layer that formed at the fiber The mechanical properties of the as-fabricated composites are side of the matrix(O in Fig 4(c). Under EDS, mainly carbon and shown in Table Ill. All the composites had dense matrices( total silicon were detected on LI and L2. On L3 and O, the peak porosity of <1l vol%), high fiber content(r> 45 vol%), nonbrittle intensity of oxygen was about twice that on LI and L2: on the fracture, and high strength. Table IV shows the strengths of the matrix(M) and the fiber (f), no oxygen was detected. opposites after oxidation Composites I and ll retained high strength, Figure 5 shows the AES spectra of the fractured surfaces of 0.8-0.6 GPa, and maintained their nonbrittle fracture, even after composite I. The AES spectra(Fig. 5)are shown instead of AE xidation at 1523 K for 100 h. The fracture surfaces of oxidized lepth profiles to illustrate the depth distribution of boron, because the composites I and Il had a region 0.1-0.4 mm wide around their aES depth profile cannot show boron content, as explained for Fig. 2 periphery, in which fibers failed along a matrix crack plane. The Figure 5(a) is the typical spectra of the surface of a pullout fiber. The center region of the fracture surface showed many pullout fibers fiber surface consisted mainly of carbon and a small amount of Reference composite r showed a large degradation in strength, 0.2 nitrogen and boron. Silicon was detected from a depth of 15 nm. GPa, and brittle fracture after oxidation. No pullout fiber was Silicon and nitrogen gradually increased, reaching saturation at a observed Heat exposure in a nitrogen-gas flow at 1523 K for 10 h depth of 80 nm because of the proximity of the fiber. Boron was caused no change of the strengths for all composites; therefore, the detected at depth 5 to 80 nm. Four pullout fibers were strength degradation using the oxidation test resulted from the mined, and all revealed similar results. Figure 5(b)is the typic oxidatio AES spectra of the fracture surface of the matrix from which a fiber Figure 6 shows the oxygen-concentration map of a cross section of had pulled out. The surface of the fractured matrix consisted of composites I, Il, and R after oxidation at 1523 K for 100 h. The matrix M B L3 L1 F 2 (a 10nm 5m(c) 10nm Fig 4. TEM image of the fiber-matrix interface of the as-fabricated composites(a)I and(b) ll, and(c)of the oxidized composite I at 1523 K for 10 h. M and F indicate matrix and fiber, respectively. L, LI, L2, and L3 indicate sublayers on the interf and B indicate an oxidized sublayer and a bubble
Figure 4(b) shows a TEM image of the fiber–matrix interface of non-oxidized composite II. The interface was a monolayer 20 nm thick, with no crystal lattice, and it exhibited an obscure ring pattern under NBED. Under EDS, the peak intensities of carbon and silicon on the interface were, respectively, about three times and one-third that on the Si-N-C matrix; therefore, the interface consisted of carbon and a small amount of silicon. Figure 4(c) shows the fiber–matrix interface of composite I oxidized at 1523 K for 10 h. The observed point located just under the oxygen-sealing layer is discussed later. The fiber, L1, and L2 exhibited no change with oxidation. L3 and the matrix showed obvious changes: (i) bright bubbles (B in Fig. 4(c)), where L3 was located before oxidation; and (ii) a layer that formed at the fiber side of the matrix (O in Fig. 4(c)). Under EDS, mainly carbon and silicon were detected on L1 and L2. On L3 and O, the peak intensity of oxygen was about twice that on L1 and L2; on the matrix (M) and the fiber (F), no oxygen was detected. Figure 5 shows the AES spectra of the fractured surfaces of composite I. The AES spectra (Fig. 5) are shown instead of AES depth profiles to illustrate the depth distribution of boron, because the AES depth profile cannot show boron content, as explained for Fig. 2. Figure 5(a) is the typical spectra of the surface of a pullout fiber. The fiber surface consisted mainly of carbon and a small amount of nitrogen and boron. Silicon was detected from a depth of 15 nm. Silicon and nitrogen gradually increased, reaching saturation at a depth of 80 nm because of the proximity of the fiber. Boron was detected at depths from 15 to 80 nm. Four pullout fibers were examined, and all revealed similar results. Figure 5(b) is the typical AES spectra of the fracture surface of the matrix from which a fiber had pulled out. The surface of the fractured matrix consisted of carbon. Silicon and nitrogen were detected at a depth from 15 nm, increased slowly, and reached saturation at a depth of 50 nm, where the Si-N-C matrix was located. Seven of eight samples showed results similar to those in Fig. 5(b); the one exception had a boron-containing surface layer. In the case of composite II, the pullout fiber had a surface layer 80–110 nm thick, which consisted of carbon and a small amount of boron. The surface layer of the fractured matrix consisted mainly of carbon and was 15 nm thick. No boron-containing layer was found on the matrix surface. (3) Oxidation Resistance of Composites The mechanical properties of the as-fabricated composites are shown in Table III. All the composites had dense matrices (total porosity of 11 vol%), high fiber content (Vf 45 vol%), nonbrittle fracture, and high strength. Table IV shows the strengths of the composites after oxidation. Composites I and II retained high strength, 0.8–0.6 GPa, and maintained their nonbrittle fracture, even after oxidation at 1523 K for 100 h. The fracture surfaces of oxidized composites I and II had a region 0.1–0.4 mm wide around their periphery, in which fibers failed along a matrix crack plane. The center region of the fracture surface showed many pullout fibers. Reference composite R showed a large degradation in strength, 0.2 GPa, and brittle fracture after oxidation. No pullout fiber was observed. Heat exposure in a nitrogen-gas flow at 1523 K for 10 h caused no change of the strengths for all composites; therefore, the strength degradation using the oxidation test resulted from the oxidation. Figure 6 shows the oxygen-concentration map of a cross section of composites I, II, and R after oxidation at 1523 K for 100 h. The matrix Table II. Strength and Elastic Modulus of Row Fibers and Coated Fibers Fiber Coating As-fabricated fiber Coated fiber Strength retention rate (%) Strength (GPa) E (GPa) Strength (GPa) E (GPa) Average SD† Average SD† Average SD† Average SD† Si3N4 I 2.07 0.50 182 24 1.59 0.70 175 27 77 Si3N4 II 1.78 0.54 173 16 1.90 0.61 151 10 106 Si3N4 R 1.71 0.38 169 11 2.06 0.56 157 5 121 SiC I 2.66 0.38 291 37 2.56 0.65 216 23 96 † SD is standard deviation. Fig. 4. TEM image of the fiber–matrix interface of the as-fabricated composites (a) I and (b) II, and (c) of the oxidized composite I at 1523 K for 10 h. M and F indicate matrix and fiber, respectively. L, L1, L2, and L3 indicate sublayers on the interface. O and B indicate an oxidized sublayer and a bubble. 1818 Journal of the American Ceramic Society—Sato et al. Vol. 85, No. 7
July 2002 C-B-Si Coatings for S,N/Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Improved Oxidation Resistance l819 C N t=0. 9ks e t=0. 6ks e t=0.3ks- u山 t=Oks 300 53 155 200 355 405 Kinetic energy (ev t=0. 9ks e t=0. 6ks e t=0.3ks r t=oks 250 300 480 530 200 355 Kinetic energy (ev) Fig. 5. Ime ge of the f ivative AES spectra on the surfaces of a(a) pullout fiber and(b)matrix from which a fiber was debonded of the fractured petra measurement was 60 s, which corresponded to -15 nm in dept posite R, of which the interface was a referential carbon layer, To evaluate the effect of C-B-Si coating for another fiber, lly oxidized to its center region. On the other hand, oxidation of coating I was applied on Sic fiber. The results are shown on composites I and Il was limited to a region 0. 1-0. 4 mm wide around Tables II-IV. The mechanical properties of the coated fiber and the periphery of the sample. The oxidized region corresponded as-fabricated composite were equal to the Si3 N4 fiber. The strengt roughly to the region that showed the flat surface after fracture. The of oxidized composite at 1523 K for 100 h was 51% of as- oxidation of composites I, I, and r proceeded microscopically on the fabricated composite. The strength after oxidation was lower than arts of the matrix adjacent to the fiber-matrix interfaces or the matrix the Si,Na fiber-reinforced composite, but higher than the case acks, and no oxidation occurred on the fibers. where carbon coating was used Table Ill. Mechanical Properties of Fabricated Composites Porosity lexural strength(GPa) LSS(MPa)° Fiber (vol% Average 11 44 0.03 V is volume faction of fiber. SD is standard deviation. ILSS is interlaminar shear strength
of composite R, of which the interface was a referential carbon layer, was fully oxidized to its center region. On the other hand, oxidation of composites I and II was limited to a region 0.1–0.4 mm wide around the periphery of the sample. The oxidized region corresponded roughly to the region that showed the flat surface after fracture. The oxidation of composites I, II, and R proceeded microscopically on the parts of the matrix adjacent to the fiber–matrix interfaces or the matrix cracks, and no oxidation occurred on the fibers. To evaluate the effect of C-B-Si coating for another fiber, coating I was applied on SiC fiber. The results are shown on Tables II–IV. The mechanical properties of the coated fiber and as-fabricated composite were equal to the Si3N4 fiber. The strength of oxidized composite at 1523 K for 100 h was 51% of asfabricated composite. The strength after oxidation was lower than the Si3N4-fiber-reinforced composite, but higher than the case where carbon coating was used. Table III. Mechanical Properties of Fabricated Composites Fiber Coating Vf (vol%)† Density (Mg/m3 ) Porosity (vol%) Flexural strength (GPa) ILSS (MPa)§ Average SD‡ Average SD‡ Si3N4 I 67 2.31 11 1.07 0.08 44 3 Si3N4 II 65 2.51 3 1.12 0.07 50 3 Si3N4 R 62 2.35 8 1.11 0.06 56 16 SiC I 57 2.55 4 1.07 0.03 93 7 † Vf is volume faction of fiber. ‡ SD is standard deviation. § ILSS is interlaminar shear strength. Fig. 5. Depth change of the first derivative AES spectra on the surfaces of a (a) pullout fiber and (b) matrix from which a fiber was debonded of the fractured composite I. Time interval of each spectra measurement was 60 s, which corresponded to 15 nm in depth. July 2002 C-B-Si Coatings for S3N4-Fiber-Reinforced Composites for Improved Oxidation Resistance 1819